Stop Trying to "Go Viral" on LinkedIn (It Will Destroy Your Profile)
Write specifically for your target market—or prepare to face the consequences.
Recently, I spoke with a highly experienced entrepreneur who was beginning to take LinkedIn seriously as a channel.
They already had an established following on Twitter and were looking to invest more on LinkedIn, as they recognized the extremely high leverage it offers.
But they weren’t sharing the hard-earned expertise they built over decades—the kind of rich experience that other decision-makers would recognize and immediately take action to capitalize on.
Instead, they were sharing generic motivational advice and leadership platitudes designed to reap the maximum engagement possible from random people.
Not because he was a bad or stupid person (quite the opposite), but because he saw other “successful” accounts with tens of thousands of likes per post doing that exact thing.
But here’s what he didn’t understand: the back-end results of those “popular accounts” are extremely unimpressive relative to the amount of attention they receive.
True, in the short to mid-term, they can make decent money on sponsorships and “Here’s how I hacked the algorithm!” courses…
…but they’re banking the entire future of their profile on whatever “algorithm hack” they’re leveraging at this moment to continue working forever—and it never does.
But the people who have built their audience over years of implementing an intelligent, audience-facing content strategy based on human psychology (rather than “algo hacks”)?
They’re reaping the increasingly awesome compounding asset of industry authority, which results in:
Qualified leads
Speaking opportunities
Brand moat
…and much, much more.
And let’s be clear: LinkedIn is currently the highest-leverage content marketing channel on the face of the earth.
But chasing virality will eventually kill your presence on the platform. Too many well-intentioned people make this mistake early in their journey and learn it the hard way.
I've been building on LinkedIn for years now, and I'm going to share exactly why you should avoid the virality trap and what you should do instead.
All Followers Aren’t Equal
Let's start with something simple: all followers aren’t created equally.
This isn't a controversial statement.
If you're selling B2B SaaS, which follower is more valuable to you?
A VP of Marketing at a Series B startup
A college student posting "hustle culture" content
The answer is obvious. But here's where it gets interesting: most people's LinkedIn strategy actively works against attracting the right followers.
The Four Levels of LinkedIn Followers
Your LinkedIn following can be broken down into four distinct levels:
Level 0 (Cold): People who don't know your content exists
Level 1 (Aware): People who've seen your content at least once
Level 2 (Engaged): Regular readers who occasionally engage
Level 3 (Champions): Die-hard supporters who amplify everything
Here's what most people don't realize: The natural progression is downward, not upward.
A new follower starts at Level 1 or 2 (high interest) and gradually decays to Level 0—unless you have a strategy to prevent it.
Credit to wono for this framework.
Why Some LinkedIn Profiles “Die”
You’ve probably seen several profiles that look like this:
100,000+ followers
Average post: 10-20 likes, 5-6 comments
Engagement rate per post: <0.50%
What happened?
In most cases, they chased virality with generic engagement bait: job-seeker advocacy, motivational quotes, basic leadership principles, and the like.
It worked—temporarily. They gained tens of thousands of followers, but they weren't remotely interested in their actual industry expertise.
The result? A dead account with ghost followers who scroll past their every post (if they see them at all). Their “thought leadership” disappeared as soon as their “hack” stopped working.
The Real Numbers Behind Quality Followers
Let me give you some concrete numbers from my own experience:
A Level 3 follower (Champion) is worth approximately 500-1000 Level 1 followers in terms of business value. Here's why:
They read everything you post (80%+ view rate)
They engage consistently (50%+ engagement rate)
They share with relevant connections (3-5 referrals per year)
They're highly likely to become clients (50%+ conversion rate when qualified)
This isn't theoretical, either—
One of my Level 3 followers (a client who previously converted from my content, actually) recently connected me with a VC with a large LinkedIn presence, who successfully referred me to another founder in the VC space.
That's worth more than 10,000 likes and comments.
How to Build a Valuable Following
Here's a concrete framework that actually works:
1. Define Your Perfect Follower
Title (e.g., "VP of Marketing")
Company stage (e.g., "Series B+")
Industry (e.g., "B2B SaaS")
Budget (e.g., "$50k+ monthly marketing spend")
2. Create Content Specifically for Them
Example: Instead of "10 Morning Habits of Successful People," write "How a Series B SaaS Increased Demo Bookings by 300% Using LinkedIn."
3. Optimize for Conversion, Not Reach
Focus on converting Level 2 followers to Level 3
Measure engagement from target accounts/demographics
4. Build a Content System
While I don’t follow an exact content calendar (too inflexible for me), I do build each of my posts around a specific content angle and pillar and plan them in advance.
For example:
Monday: Case study/results post for a ghostwriting client
Wednesday: Strategic insight into what formats currently work best on LinkedIn
Friday: Technical deep-dive into how the LinkedIn algorithm works
With every post, my goal is to include
Real numbers/results/data
Specific action items
Clear target audience call-out
The ROI of Building the Right Following
Let’s imagine you’re the co-founder and CEO of a cutting-edge fintech platform that’s solving a fundamental problem that enterprise SaaS finance teams routinely struggle with (accurate MRR and ARR reporting).
If I offered you one of two outcomes on LinkedIn, which would you choose?
Option One: 100,000 generic followers
0.5% follower engagement rate
1-3 qualified calls booked per month
$50,000 annual revenue from LinkedIn
Option Two: 10,000 qualified followers:
1-3% follower engagement rate
10-20 qualified calls booked per month
$600,000+ annual revenue from LinkedIn
Obviously, you’d choose the second option in a heartbeat. It doesn’t provide the same ego boost as a six-figure follower number, but with that amount of revenue directly attributable to LinkedIn, you’re doing just fine.
The reason my example was particularly specific is that it was (loosely) inspired by a real person: Bobby Pinero.
He’s taken the time to build a quality following over the years and, as a result, reaps increasingly large benefits from doing so.
Practical Implementation
If you're starting from zero, here's your exact playbook:
Month 1-2: Create 20-30 pieces of hyper-targeted content; send 10-15 connection requests daily
Month 2-3: Start publishing consistently (3x/week)
Month 3-4: Build your Level 3 follower base
Month 4+: Scale what's working based on feedback/data
The key metric isn't follower count—it's the number of Level 2 and 3 followers you have emerging from your target market.
Your Next Steps
If you're a leader at a business that generates over $1M in revenue annually, you have zero time to implement all of this yourself.
Given that I'm extremely good at this, you should outsource it to me. If that interests you, please book a call with me here.
If that doesn't describe you, but you'd still like to work with me, please book a paid coaching call with me here.
In any case, I'll see you in the next newsletter (coming when it's ready).
Thanks for reading.
PS: Although this newsletter is shorter than my previous ones, I felt I “made up” for it by packing it with valuable/novel ideas. I’d love to do an ultra-deep dive every newsletter, but I want to publish more often than every 1-2 months!
Excellent narrative to analyse and categorise followers.
We don‘t need to think about quantity or quality - we need quantity OF quality, that means a suitable density of the right followers.
Chasing viral posts rather damages as the influx of „wrong“ followers destroy future reach.
I am so happy to see you here.
I am your strong follower on LinkedIn. (I used strong for lack of words)
Thank you very much for your knowledge sharing.